Skip navigation

Have you ever come across people whose ego seems to be bigger than their brain? You would not have had enough experience in your workplace or insufficient socialisation if you have not. In this context I am referring to the meaning of “ego” as an exaggerated sense of self-importance to the point of being conceited.

Granted that all of us have some ego in the form of personal pride and self-esteem, in well-balanced individuals this is usually tempered with humility and mindfulness. It is those with unbridled ego that can create a lot of misunderstanding,misery and stress in people having to deal with them. I believe proper upbringing and good religious (any religion) and moral education and life-changing experiences would moderate ego and make life better for everyone.

Now who are those with egotism? I do not think normal people are born with this characteristic. Some become egotistical as a form of a defence-mechanism to reduce the amount of anxiety especially when they are not good in certain skills or not conversant with certain knowledge. Sometimes out of sheer luck this type are put in the position of power and this is when you will see the ego flying off the handle and become berserk.

An egotistical person has the tendency to think that whatever they decide is good and Lo Behold! those who oppose them or give a different view and hence bruising their ego . They would go around threatening others whom they perceive as their difficult staff. They would appear stern to hide their inadequacies. When they talk on serious business, you could detect their mediocrity. And yet their ego would not allow them to accept that they are not quite right or worse still, not quite with it. This no-go attitude is an anathema to any organisation.

Another ego bursting time, especially in the workplace, be it the private and (especially) the government sector, is when a relatively young officer or staff is promoted to a higher rank. These people, in trying to assert their new found status will suddenly behave as if they are the ones with the power and would exercise that power insensitively and much to the chagrin of their staff or colleagues. Other egotistical employees would include bosses’ blue-eyed boys (and girls).

And killing others' talent too.

People who have a big ego would usually talk down to others and would not change their decisions easily despite their being shown to be unreasonable. As far as these unfortunate blockheads are concerned it is their way or the highway. And they also are not normally consultative and they use their power to threaten and victimise others to the extent of cowing the whole organisation they lead. As you guess it, these people are the subject of much cursing by those around and under them.

The only thing that can alter their ego is when they suffer from some sad events such as accidents, death of loved ones, diseases such as life-threatening cancer or faced with legal problems exposing them to public ridicule and contempt. Only then would they realise that their ego is nothing but a state of mind.

Strangely enough these egotistical staff or officers will curl their tails in between their legs whenever they interact with some one higher than them for example, the company’s CEO, the government chief secretary or the minister. And so, in these instances, they actually can modulate and deflate their bloody ego which is only a no-go for their weak underlings.

C’est la vie!

The last three weeks or so have been abuzz with talks and public debates on the new health insurance scheme soon to be introduced to Malaysians and boringly named 1 Care. And as usual when insufficient information is available thus lacking transparency, people will tend to make their own assumptions and conclusions. And as expected when a new scheme is imposed on the public affecting their income and choices, there will likely be an outcry. The non-mainstream news portals, blogs, social media networks like Facebook and Twitter become an outlet to vent angry oppositions.

To conclude that the health ministry has not done its works on this controversial new health insurance scheme is unfair as they have been working on this healthcare financing scheme for many years as a response to an escalating increase in healthcare cost. Other countries like the UK,Germany, Singapore and Australia have already put in place healthcare schemes which mandate public contribution to ensure its sustainability. Yes, there are countries among these which cap the number of visits to specialists’ care and impose a certain percentage in mandatory personal contribution.

What I see as rather unfortunate (or is it fortunate?) in this 1 Care issue is that it is being leaked out prematurely by some quarters out to create ( inadvertently?) public confusion and subsequent apprehension especially in the months running up to the 13th general election which must be called before March 2013. There must have been some rattlings in the Barisan Nasional (BN) camp as this issue could be used against them in this election. So crucial it is that you may notice that the Minister of health immediately coming out to say that the scheme is not yet finalised, that it is still at the preliminary discussion stage and the public should not be alarmed (typical politician’s garble). And then a junior officer from the same ministry refuted the minister’s statement by saying that the discussions were actually in a very advanced stage here.

Hassan Abdul Rahman,Health DG -inarticulate?

Then you have one of the most pathetic responses from a government department in memory. The health director general went on national TV to state that the scheme is not yet cast in stone and that the 10% cut in personal income as a contribution to the scheme is just a proposal and that the scheme will allow patients to choose between a private hospital or a public hospital at no cost ( Dear me! at no extra cost? many of us would surely opt for private hospital with its 5-star facilities. Now how sustainable will this kind of healthcare in Malaysia be?) and that the government will probably decide to settle all the contribution! Lord! What kind of garbage is that? And on national TV too? If the government wants to bear all the cost, then why the heck should there be a new healthcare insurance scheme? We are already having a 98% subsidised public healthcare in Malaysia! Laughable indeed.

To be sustainable, any healthcare insurance scheme in the world will require public contribution. It is the structural payment mechanisms and the shared cost that would need careful considerations/deliberations to ensure relatively smooth implementation.

And so we are left with more questions than answers after that mediocre response from the top civil servant of the health ministry.

As if it is not enough, the following day in the Malaysian Insider, some junior officer contradicted the director general’s remark on the 10% contribution by saying that it was never a proposal but in fact it was a finding in their studies that people spent about 10% of their income on healthcare. Jesus, how could the head and the subordinate say two different things on the same issue? . What is happening to this once fine ministry? You have three different versions , one from the politician (the Minister), the second from a “blur” DG as head of department and the third (most likely the “real” one) is from two junior officers. And don’t forget there is yet another version from an anonymous source, probably from among those members of the so-called 11 technical working groups deliberating on this new scheme!

Liow Tiong Lai, health minister - garbled?

And today the minister of health Liow Tiong Lai came out again to give another piecemeal information that 1 Care is actually an upgrade of the existing healthcare system and we should expect him to come out yet again with more disjointed information in the coming days as the controversy rages on.

I sure miss Dr Chua Soi Lek, former Malaysian best health Minister. He would be able to give us a clearer picture/narrative of this proposed healthcare insurance scheme. Incidentally, concerns have been raised about the current health DG whose competency in dealing with big issues such as this is found to be wanting.

Any health officer can announce disease statistics or disease outbreaks and rattle off health advice to the public. Nothing is difficult about that routine stuff. A leader, however, will show his true colors as exemplified by the following: leadership,competency,acumen,intelligence,clarity of ideas, confidence, articulateness, strength of character,unsuitability, mediocrity,stupidity, poverty of ideas and weakness of character in time of crisis or controversy and people tend to view this healthcare insurance issue as a form of crisis due to the impending general election.

The issue should therefore be addressed succinctly to allay public fury, fear and anxiety. Contradictory responses/statements are bad news. In short, an incompetent and an inarticulate top public official is not only embarrassing but might also cost the present government dearly at the ballot box.

Does anyone care?

It never ceases to amaze me how a major review of existing scheme or service including the most recent SBPA (Saraan Baru Perkhidmatan Awam) or New Public Service Remuneration Scheme seems to fail at the implementation stage. This failure usually reflects poor planning. Matters like this usually takes a longer time to discuss as it involves parties with differing interests and perspective. Not enough time is given to these people to have their views heard,discussed and later modified, adapted, adopted, accepted or discarded .

A Multi-sectoral consultation and meeting, undoubtedly, can be lengthy and costly in terms of time,money and effort. A time/activity charts and effective moderators are invaluable. Having sat at national and international meetings, I can tell you that these articulate “creatures” are indeed few.

Clear objectives and groundwork have to be formulated and developed and most importantly succinctly articulated. There is no such things as a review without any constraints be it funding or budgeting. It looks to me the government has somewhat lost its leading role in this debacle, reading this article and another one here in the Malaysian Insider.

An implementation failure of a review such as this is quickly capitalized by the opposition who are always wise after the event. It makes the government appear incompetent and not inclusive. Perhaps PKR is right in accusing Putrajaya as bulldozing the civil service emoluments review in time for the upcoming general election.

Someone has miscalculated the response of those who are the so-called biggest stakeholders – the non-premier groups. And how does the government plan to increase the salary of these groups without bursting its allocated fund? Right from the beginning a respective percentage increase based on agreed formulas should have been worked out and then only those other perks outlined and discussed.

Imagine the implementation of SBPA is supposed to be on January 1 2012 and at the rate things are going, it does not look as if it is going to be finalised very soon. It is not an easy task for the Chairman of the review Taskforce of the structural review (sounds complicated?) of the new emolument’s plan that is integral to SBPA currently being disputed by CUEPACS . Knowing the chairman, I think they are all in for a long haul!

Ismail Adam - Taskforce chairman- too philosophical, too suave, too......

CUEPACS representing the majority of government staff should not take an extreme fighting stance as the government in their haste to implement the SBPA might just give in and inadvertently cop out more than it can financially afford.

The story of the unions’ demands in France, Greece and the UK to a certain extent, has shown how destructive economically it is in the long run, pandering to those “socialist-leaning” workers!

I am not scare-mongering, far from that. What I am trying to say is the government appears to have failed to do an exhaustive groundwork on this new wage plan for civil servants though, without doubt, they have the best of intention. The officers seem to have no clear guidelines on the approach to instituting the differing change in the salary status quo. On what basis are those increases made? Surely there is some formulas being employed to arrive at them. Can they justify those considered factors? If they have done enough homeworks, they can get this “stalemate” resolved faster. And disregard the stakeholders at your folly! Gone are the days when you could just ram in your “whims and fancies” so to speak.

Omar Osman , CUEPACS president too single-minded, too carried away, too.....

Letting CUEPACS has its way is also unwise. To them seniority must be preserved at all cost, demolishing the precept that it is knowledge,skill and talent which enrich and drive any organisation. To CUEPACS, it is better to stay mediocre as long as workers are happy! An inward looking notion indeed. It also seems that CUEPACS have the tendency to overlook meritocracy, the higher burden of responsibility and accountability besides the entry qualifications and extra post-graduate degrees that higher-ranking officers possess to justify the salary. If the salary gap between the officers and lower category staff is getting narrower, where is the incentive for our children to study hard, get admitted to a university and excel and serve in the government?

How can an accountant,an engineer, a doctor or a dentist has a similar grade with an arts graduate on joining the civil service? It has been an unfair scheme for so many years. Union-less, they suffer in silence. No weightage is given to the length of the course or the inherent difficulties. No wonder the private sector is more attractive to the talented and the government is left with the “foam”.

And so we have very senior civil servants who have a degree in history/geography/language studies with a master or even PhD in public policy from some unknown American University become director-general or secretary general and these people are expected to lead inter-sectoral discussion groups to review services? They will only know how to direct and let their “clever” subordinates do the rest. I have come across such pathetic senior officers in my dealing with government agencies. And one more thing, they are very protocol-conscious and tend to only mingle with their lots in the same seniority.

Feedback from lower officers are best received through respectful interactions/ consultations and not through pure directives. It is possible that our senior civil servants are still acting like the old British MCS officers. Those in UK British civil service now have adopted modern values of inclusiveness and goal-oriented teamwork.

An inclusive civil service culture is only lip service in this country and so is it any wonder that a number of government proposals,projects,programs,restructuring and review are having problems at the implementation level?

Now that CUEPACS has its own group working on fine-tuning the recommendations in SBPA, it’s like a big brother “correcting” a sloppy homework. Some of their grouses, by the way, do have a valid point. An appropriate civil service leadership’s response, would go a long way in making this new scheme implementable without jeopardizing public interests.

" A Healthy, Happy and Prosperous New Year of the Water Dragon 2012"- Net Image

Wishing all my blog visitors Gong Xi Fa Cai! Yes, this year is especially auspicious in the Chinese calendar, being the lunar year of the Dragon (HAIL THE MIGHTY DRAGON!)

Being a Dragon child had indeed placed a lot of stress on me as I was supposed to achieve great things in life. Though I do not quite believe in the horoscopes and would try to avoid reading them but sometimes curiosity got the better of me. Like a restless teenager , I want to know how I am being described as a character and my fortune foretold, knowing there are millions sharing my birth year in this Great Planet!

My New year (2012) horoscopes (horrorscopes) below..and my own response in blue.

Quote “The Dragon is the mightiest of the signs. Dragons symbolize such character traits as dominance (ask my friends not my staff) and ambition (Am I, like others, not extremely ambitious?). They are driven, unafraid of challenges ( scary but true!) and willing to take risks ( so much so that I end up gaining less on DJI than I should!). They are passionate ( Yep, till it hurts!) in what they do and they do in grand fashion ( you could say that again!).

While Dragons frequently help others,rarely will they ask for help (too proud!). Dragons prefer to be alone ( I agree ). Dragons have tempers that can flair fast! (You should see me hissing smoke!). Success comes easy for Dragons( not that easy, but succeed I did!).

You will be rewarded as the fast pace suits you well ( yes, it does, much to the chagrin of others!). Do be cautious with money making schemes ( overcautious you might say!). Good progress with career and financial fronts ( this I must believe!). Avoid arguments ( Arrrgh… I can’t help this). Dragons are compatible with the Monkey or Rat (Gees…) and incompatible with the OX ( Oh no… the love of my life!)” Unquote.

A good way to look at this is to imagine that you have all the positive attributes and mentally work towards realising your dreams. Whenever you falter and fall you should get up come back to recall those traits and try again and again and indeed, perseverance usually pays in any field you choose.

Looking back in my immediate family circle, I am the most successful academically and professionally. Does that have anything to do with my being a Dragon? No one can tell. Only a down and out Dragon can share his life story and expunge the myth of being born in a Dragon year!

By the way, I have another Dragon in the family, dear me! This one is more tenacious in his pursuit to be successful. In fact he has overcome extreme odds and tribulation to be where he is today and we can only pray that he continues riding on the mythical Dragon and Good Fortune follows him wherever he goes just as it does me all these years.

Yes, I love being a Dragon.

If you think Shahrizat Jalil is taking leave to rest you are absolutely wrong. She actually needs the time to file a RM100 million defamation suit here against the opposition politicians who have been making revelations/accusations against her family in the reportedly messy National Feedlot Corporation or NFC scandal. The lady won’t take things laying down.

Anwar the de facto leader of the opposition party,PKR, used to file similar suits, i.e suing for this ridiculous sum to muzzle further comments on his character in the past. And, yes, his latest multi-million defamation suit against Utusan, the Malay language newspaper which commented negatively on his recent interview with British Broadcasting Corporation or BBC on gay rights in Malaysia here. This suing seems to be never-ending. In fact Anwar could be an arm chair multimillionaire if he were to win all those suits!

Through Shahrizat, PKR is now given a taste of their own medicine though I think the whole thing is an abuse of the court’s process. This kind of suit whether from the government or the opposition politicians is again using the court to settle political matters. The court has more pressing cases to attend to than dealing with this frivolous suit.

This culture of suing seems to be peculiar to Malaysia. When the wife of the chief of a European bank was found to benefit from some financial dealings related to the bank, her husband promptly resigned. There was no news of him suing the people who exposed the moral infraction.

Will this kind of suit stop the revelations of wrongdoings of people in power? The only workable solution is for credible anonymous reports of corruption to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Council or MACC to be speedily investigated without fear or favour and the guilty be dealt with by the court only then will the people have faith in the system. The corrupt will instead be officially and legally defamed.

But the legal process takes time and the opposition,wanting very much to capitalise on these negative practices of ‘government’s cronies” seeing that the general election is imminent, just cannot wait. This is all about political opportunities to demoralise your opponents in the eye of the voting public.

And so things are not that simple as in the contentious case of being legally right but morally wrong. To the general public the moral angle is just as important and is somehow crying out to be addressed.

This morning’s news here on the university student who posted a threat to bomb our PM’s helicopter speak volumes about our authority’s seemingly “kesian (pity)” attitude. The pity here is definitely wrongly placed. The culprit is 24 years old and certainly old enough to vote and he should be responsible for his actions and face the consequences. Ignorance is no defence.

In light of the recent blasts near the court on the day Anwar was acquitted on 09 January 2012 and the frightening conclusion that the bombs were home-made by an expert, we cannot take this kind of “joke” lightly. If the authorities let this daredevil off the hook, they would be opening a Pandora’s box setting off many more such “jokes” on the net and you would not know which one is actually going to be fatal!

Prosecute the culprit unless he is found to be mentally ill and let there be a lesson to anyone who dares issue such a threat and become a menace to our peaceful society. Don’t set a precedent of non prosecution only to regret later considering a challenging general election is around the corner.

Notice that I said “our PM” because I respect the post. It could be anyone holding the post beside Najib. And so it is our duty as citizens to protect the sanctity of the most important government post of our country. If we fail to give this joker a deterrent punishment, not only do we not respect the post and human lives, but we will give a wrong signal to many young people out there whose power to cause havoc is at the click of their fingertips.

During the UK riot in August 2011, two men posted messages urging people in their areas to come out and burn down the city and both were speedily prosecuted and sentenced to four years’ jail each! Too harsh you think? But that immediately stopped the posting of more of such incendiary messages.

The UK authorities were clear and firm in their handling of such threat on social media networks used by millions of people and some might be like-minded/copycat and flood the net with similar irresponsible messages.

Even if the bomb threat is aimed at an Opposition Leader, the identified culprit should also be prosecuted and the same punishment under the relevant section of the Penal Code, meted out. In short, this man should not be let off scot free! This should be extended to anyone, regardless of race,creed and political inclinations, who dares to make such threat publicly.

This is not about an opposition sentiment because an opposition will always oppose whatever the government does. And this is not about the government’s right to response, this is about ensuring that people do not make jokes on matters which are sensitive to public security and inimical to public order.

Many concerned Malaysians are watching closely the saga of the Cow Family, an infamous label given to the family of the Minister for Women, Family and Community Development, Senator Shahrizat Abdul Jalil. Her family’s conduct in the RM250m government loan at an extremely low interest rate to operate a cattle-farming business under the name of National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) is currently being investigated.

Following disclosures by the opposition of the loan’s misuse and abuse to benefit her family, instead of stepping down gracefully, this woman went on to trumpet that she had nothing to do with the mess excreted (for want of a better word) by her husband, the executive chairman of the corporation and their children, none of whom has a degree in accountancy,as high-salaried directors.

She goes on to babble that the opposition is scared of the strength of Wanita UMNO (Women Wing), of which she is the Head and so has singled her out and attacked her and her family to gain a political advantage. Jesus Christ! Does she think she can hide behind the party for the unethical and atrocious corruption that her family committed? This is a typical person who, being a lawyer by training, would look at the technical angle of the controversy and harp on it to confuse people. She made a pathetic figure in attempting to act as if nothing had happened at the recent UMNO Meet.

I am not an opposition lover but I think they are vital in exposing this kind of corruption at the high level. In the past the Auditor-General would make negative comments on certain projects but if they are related to the government politicians, there were no follow-up. This time around the people who make up the opposition are more knowledgeable and they simply embrace this negative report and delve into it further and dig out more mess it is hiding.

And so Shahrizat, as the wife of the Chairman of NFC, don’t tell us that you have nothing to do with the corporation. Do you really think your mere lecturer of a husband would get the massive loan at an incredibly low interest rate, without your political influence? Of course there would be no record of your being there at the moment of the cabinet approval of the loan. But we are not stupid.

But really the whole controversy is not about the loan approval. The issue is about how the highly decadent family has abused the terms of the loan, using our money (tax payers) for their personal benefit: buying luxury condos,luxury cars and luxury holidays and transferring the fund to other non-related businesses in Singapore as reported widely in the non-mainstream news. On top of that, the target of the project is not achieved (ref: Auditor-General’s Report 2010)

The latest revelation is on how Shahrizat’s husband could have paid someone ( a con man) more than RM1.5m to bribe the police so that the latter would not investigate the NFC brutally. This latest exposure is hitting hard at the credibility and integrity of the Cow Family of which Shahrizat is a member, whether she likes it or not. This attempt to muzzle the enforcement personnel is too much for Najib’s government. Cool as Najib appears to be he must have been rattled especially after the Anwar sodomy II not guilty verdict on 09 Jan 2012 fresh on his mind.

Shahrizat as a (non-elected) member of the cabinet cannot be present to listen in to what the cabinet is discussing on her family. And after much behind-the scene cajolery, finally she is applying for leave here ostensibly to facilitate the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Council or MACC to conduct their investigations and giving a breather to her exasperated colleagues.

Shahrizat Jalil-Technically right but morally wrong so far

Shahrizat you may be technically right for not having anything to do with the messy corporation your husband leads but you are surely morally wrong for being linked personally with this corrupt business because you are politically connected to the government which approved the massive loan in the first place. It is hard not to believe that you must’ve somehow benefited from the corrupt activities.The right thing to do is to submit your resignation as a Minister and face the music with your family, as an ordinary citizen.

Take an extended break lady. In fact it is better that you don’t come back from your leave. Step down please and step down gracefully and save Najib’s government from further embarrassment. You are a political liability to UMNO and to BN, period.

The article on the spending habit of Malaysians here is right on. In fact the mushrooming of shopping malls is encouraging this overspending nature of our people. Just look at the lifestyle cafe joints being set up all over the cities. Starbucks, Coffee Beans, OldTown cafe and all the rest of them. These places encourage young people to spend on costly concoction of drinks and they provide WiFi facilities ostensibly to facilitate young executives to work while chilling off , what an irony!

Credit Cards - a Convenient or a Bane?

Then you have banks offering credit cards to all and sundry. You also have frequent sales plus those so-called loyalty cards and you get SMSs on new merchandise coming in from concept stores and you get reward points for spending…. spend RM500.00 on one receipt and you get triple the points or additional vouchers to go on spending, Dear me, all the pressure from the business people is truly overwhelming. And then those gadgets which keep on churning out new models. I personally know of a relative who has every single iPhone model,iPad and iPod you name it , he’s got it. It is like an addiction if you read my previous posting on the subject.

Then they have these stamps for you to collect the more you spend the more you collect and you can redeem these stamps plus additional cost for lovely items like crockery or pots and pans. So if you like those items you would go on spending in order to get them.

And then you are confronted with online shopping where you order items right in the comfort of your home using your credit card, yes, it is so easy to spend and keep on spending.

In the meantime,the telcos keep sending messages asking you to download these and that and you get all these advertisements on your Facebook, your free emails your TVs your newspapers, we are thoroughly deluged with them! It is very difficult for those without sufficient early training of saving to manage these concerted attempts to make you spend.

The credit cards’ issuers also appear to up the ante by allowing holders to pay minimum amount on their cards’ expenditure and increasing interest on the balance, making people perpetually be in debt. Also the easy loans given out to people to buy cars, the repayment period used to be five years and now it has become nine years, again people are virtually enslaved to the lender. The loan sharks is another evil feature of this kind of society buying things on credit.

Numerous social problems have emerged out of this spending habit. We have heard of young people being declared bankrupt almost daily mostly due to living beyond their means like buying cars on loan and not having the capability of paying off the lending agency.

I think the policy of making everyone own a car is short-sighted. A good government should plan for its citizens’ good quality of life through well-planned infrastructures and amenities. Citizens should not be made to shoulder heavy transportation costs to go about their daily life. You can see how good planning of public transportation in great cities like London and Paris make going around not only cheaper but more convenient. A lot of cost-saving here in terms of car’s purchase,maintenance and petrol.

The failure of the Malaysian government to develop public transportation system is regrettable, already our roads and highways are chockablock-ed/ gridlocked with traffics (plus high accident rate), but our people are spending more because it is so easy for them to just drive to the shopping mall however far it is. If we have to go by public transport we would be more thrifty.

Uncontrolled Consumerism is a Mental Sickness

The pressure to spend and spend is partly influenced by the environment.The consumer society that we live in today lulls its members into materialism by making them more spendthrift. As we advance towards a high income nation we will need to nurture thriftiness in our children to avoid wasteful consumerism and promote better saving.

Just 40 minutes ago I received an SMS regarding the verdict of an acquittal for Anwar Ibrahim. What an anti-climax for his supporters! Almost everyone was expecting a guilty verdict after Anwar “lambasted” the trial judge and wanted to recuse him for being “bias” in his comments regarding Saiful, the accuser and alleged sodomy victim, being a truthful and credible witness during the trial.

Looks like Najib and his government has to adopt Plan B now for the upcoming 13th General Election!

The prosecution’s appeal will take time and the tactical time is after the GE.

Well, good for Anwar and his supporters and now the world knows that our court is not influenced by the government and yet I have this nagging feeling that the way the whole thing was handled by the prosecution had raised a lot of queries and created reasonable doubt. On technical ground, evidence can be demolished by a good defence.

But look at the editorial of this foreign online newspaper here, the last line of the last paragraph sounded like a threat to me.

Do we need a leader who is indebted to and likely to be subservient to a foreign power?

The whole of Malaysia and perhaps some parts of the world are waiting for the verdict on Anwar’s sodomy II trial. After all these years, delayed by numerous attempts to stop the court hearing, we at last will know the fate of the man who used to be the “next” Prime Minister of Malaysia. And instead of waiting in respectful and dignified silence for the judge to deliver his judgement, Anwar’s fanatical supporters have decided to come out in full force and assemble in front of the court to express their joy should Anwar be found not guilty or fury if he is convicted. Either way they must have Plan B up their sleeves.

Everyone at the 901 gathering needs Plan B

One could just imagine that the supporters are bringing two types of banners depending on the nature of the verdict and have probably been instructed on what to do either way. Curiously interesting this gathering on January 9 2012 referred to as 901! Malaysians will witness the whole “opera” with bated breath.

It is also not extraordinary that there are a few hundred police reports being lodged by people from various parts of the country against the proposed gathering which could be incendiary. How do you control such a large crowd out to make a point ahead of the defining 13th General Election most likely to be called this very year? The police, citing the recently passed (yet to be gazetted) Peaceful Assembly Act 2011, has permitted the application by the organizer and would be acting based on ensuring law and order during the assembly. As anticipated, the Bar Council has promptly lauded the police’s move.

The Inspector General of Police warns 901 organisers against sedition

Much to the credit of the police, certain conditions are set to ensure a peaceful assembly of people with highly charged emotion. Among the conditions are: Gathering is confined at the court’s car park,no banner asking for Anwar to be freed,no speeches and loud hailers to excite the crowd and all have to disperse after an hour following the delivery of the verdict.

I don’t believe for one minute that the police will come unprepared. They should at all cost have Plan B because a large crowd of agitated people is hard to predict. It is better to prepare for a worst-case scenario.

On the other hand, should those “demonstrators” turn violent, their action will serve to discredit the organizer which is the opposition alliance. Can they afford this wild response so near to the general election? They are undoubtedly being scrutinized by Malaysian voters. They would be foolish to jeopardize their parties’ chances at the general election. In fact this is their last golden opportunity to show the world that they are civilized and a worthy opposition which is respectful of the court’s decision. And possibly win over the hearts of those who always love an underdog!

So far the government is seen to be fair by allowing this gathering though not right in front of the court complex. Imagine, either way the opposition is going to have some smart words to say. But surely should the defendant be found guilty, they are not going to condemn the judge as that would be in contempt of the court and the organizers could be arrested for the action.

And fancy that the opposition should come out with the call for the people to be the judge of this sodomy case! How many people are they talking about? This is nothing but a gimmicky tactic. It does appear that some people just cannot extricate themselves from the conspiracy theory, like someone planted Anwar’s semen into Saiful’s anus! And that all those expert witnesses for the prosecution are incompetent and outright liars.

Such is their concentration and faith on the perceived infallibility of Anwar Ibrahim, they have dismissed the plaintiff’s rights. I wonder whether there would be supporters of the supposed victim of sodomy, Saiful Bukhari Azlan. Though the Police seems to give the impression that such a crowd would also be there. This group also will have Plan B.

And the cable TV and foreign journalists will no doubt come in droves to report the event. I foresee CNN,BBC and AlJazeera are also getting ready with their Plan B on format of reporting tailoring to the verdict. In fact, we as anxious spectators will also be at that court in spirits and later setting blogs, Twitters, Facebook and other social media networks abuzz.

The person who has only one definite Plan is our honorable Judge! I pray that he weighs all the evidence and arrives at the right decision and judgement in the interest of justice and the sanctity of our justice system.

Many of us do not have the full story or facts of the case unless we followed the court proceedings closely so we should not be overzealous in commenting on the verdict particularly before its delivery by His Honor. If a negative sentiment is expressed openly we might get hauled up for sedition.

After watching the series of violent UK riots in August 2011 being broadcast to the entire world, I hope our 901 assembly would turn out to be a walk in the park…. or would it? That’s the reason I am obsessed with Plan B.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.